New cancer data reveals 5 key takeaways in Canada


1 / 4-century of cancer data is now out there in a report collectively launched by the Canadian Cancer Society, Statistics Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada on Tuesday.

The Canadian Cancer Statistics 2022 particular report on cancer prevalence sheds gentle on the most typical types of cancer over the 25 years between 1994 and 2018, in addition to the populations more than likely to be recognized.

As the variety of folks dwelling with cancer, or dwelling post-cancer, in Canada rises, so will the demand for cancer help and care.

The report goals to assist establish gaps in well being care and cancer care, and provide some clues as to how sources will be allotted to fill these gaps, in keeping with Jeff Latimer, director normal of well being statistics with Statistics Canada.

“Timely and accurate data on cancer prevalence in Canada is critical to understanding the disease’s toll on society and our healthcare system,” Latimer said in a media release issued on Tuesday.

“Data are invaluable in assessing cancer outcomes, measuring how far we’ve come, and identifying areas for improvement.” explores some key findings from the report under.

All of the next charges are per 100,000 folks, over a interval of 25 years, except famous in any other case. The report didn’t embody data for Quebec.


According to the report, cancer in reproductive organs and colorectal cancer are most prevalent throughout Canada, by a large margin.

From 1994 to 2018, breast cancer accounted for 19.4 per cent of all diagnoses, whereas prostate cancer accounted for 17.8 per cent and colorectal cancer accounted for 11.3 per cent.

A graph exhibiting the prevalence of cancer per 100,000 folks by sort as of 2018. (Canadian Cancer Registry/Canadian Cancer Society)Melanoma accounted for 5.5 per cent of diagnoses, thyroid cancer accounted for 5 per cent, bladder cancer for 4.6 per cent, non-hodgkin lymphoma for 4.5 per cent, uterine cancer for 4.4 per cent, lung and bronchus cancers for 4.1 per cent, kidney and renal pelvis cancer for 3.2 per cent and all different cancers for 20.2 per cent.


According to the research, most individuals – 60.9 per cent – who had cancer or had been dwelling post-cancer had been 5 to 25 years out from their analysis. This period accounted for almost all of people that had been recognized with breast, prostate and colorectal cancer.

An additional 20.7 per cent had been between two and 5 years out, and 18.4 per cent had been zero to 2 years out.

Among folks with lung and bronchus cancers, 37.5 per cent had been between zero and two years out from analysis, 37.1 per cent had been between 5 and 25 years out and 25.4 per cent had been between two and 5 years out.

According to the report, the primary couple of years after analysis are when sufferers are more than likely to be receiving major cancer therapy or recovering from its results.

“The third to fifth 12 months after analysis is a interval that usually requires shut scientific follow-up for recurrence or one other major cancer, in addition to supportive care,” the report states.

“People alive greater than 5 years after a cancer analysis have possible accomplished their therapy, however some should want scientific monitoring and supportive care.”


Over research durations of two and 5 years, all cancers had been usually extra prevalent in rural settings in comparison with city settings.

This was the case in all provinces and territories, besides Nunavut the place the whole inhabitants was thought of rural, and Manitoba, the place prevalence was about equal.

A graph exhibiting rural and concrete cancer prevalence per 100,000 folks as of 2018. (Canadian Cancer Registry/Canadian Cancer Society)One issue driving this urban-rural divide is probably going age, the report states, since Canadians dwelling in rural areas are usually older than these dwelling in city areas and cancer analysis charges are increased in seniors.

The report stated established cancer danger elements “reminiscent of smoking, alcohol consumption and weight problems” are additionally extra frequent amongst folks dwelling in rural areas, in comparison with these in city areas.


Between 1994 and 2018, cancer charges had been highest in the japanese provinces and Ontario, and usually decrease in the central and western provinces.

Specifically, the prevalence of cancer was highest in Newfoundland and Labrador, adopted by New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, P.E.I., Ontario, British Columbia, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, Yukon, Northwest Territories and Nunavut, in that order. Quebec was not included.

A graph exhibiting cancer prevalence per 100,000 folks by province as of 2018. (Canadian Cancer Registry/Canadian Cancer Society)As with charges in city and rural settings, the authors stated variations in age distribution, danger elements and diagnostics affect the charges in every province.


The research discovered nationwide cancer charges per 100,000 folks rose progressively over 25 years, from 1994 to 2018. However, the authors attribute the rise to an ageing inhabitants, in addition to higher cancer screening and coverings, which each enhance the chances of survival throughout sure cancer varieties.

The report didn’t take a look at environmental elements that may contribute to cancer charges and outcomes, reminiscent of publicity to recognized carcinogens, and stated the nationwide data wanted to raised perceive these elements in Canada are “restricted or missing.”

“Together the cancer management group is working to handle these essential data and information gaps in order that we will higher establish disparities in outcomes that require elevated consideration and funding,” the report concludes.  


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here